The Problem and the Fix
Without a skill
- Each manager writes probation reviews differently, with no standard criteria
- You have no scoring rubric, so decisions feel subjective and hard to defend
- Building a review template from scratch takes HR teams 8+ hours of research
With aidowith.me
- Get a scored rubric with 4 rating levels for every competency in your template
- Include 30-60-90 day checkpoints so reviews happen at consistent intervals
- Export as fillable PDF, Word doc, or paste directly into your HRIS
Who Builds This With AI
HR & People Ops
Job descriptions, interview kits, onboarding docs built fast.
Managers & Leads
Reports, presentations, and team comms handled faster.
Founders
Move fast on pitches, pages, research. AI as your first hire.
How It Works
Define review criteria
Select role-specific competencies, cultural fit indicators, and performance benchmarks. AI suggests criteria based on your role type and industry.
Generate scoring rubric and feedback sections
AI builds a 4-level scoring rubric for each criterion, plus structured feedback fields. Includes 30-60-90 day checkpoint structure.
Add decision frameworks and export
Get manager talking points for pass, extend, and terminate scenarios. Export the finished template in your preferred format.
Build Your Probation Review Template
Twelve steps to a structured, reusable review template your whole team can follow.
Start This Skill →What You Walk Away With
Define review criteria
Generate scoring rubric and feedback sections
Add decision frameworks and export
Export as fillable PDF, Word doc, or paste directly into your HRIS
"We were winging probation reviews for years. This template brought consistency across 4 departments. Managers love the talking points for difficult conversations."- HR Business Partner, logistics company
Questions
The template includes role-specific competency criteria, a 4-level scoring rubric, written feedback sections, 30-60-90 day checkpoints, manager talking points for all outcomes, and compliant language guidance. It's ready to use across departments.
Yes. You set the criteria for each role type at the start. A sales rep review focuses on pipeline metrics and client interaction, while an engineer review covers technical delivery and collaboration. The structure stays consistent, but the content adapts.
The route generates language guidance based on common employment law principles. It flags potentially problematic phrasing and suggests compliant alternatives. For jurisdiction-specific requirements, have your legal team review the final version.