The Problem and the Fix
Without a skill
- AI gives you a generic pros-and-cons list that doesn't match your specific constraints or priorities
- You ask AI for a recommendation and get a paragraph that says "it depends" without showing the logic
- Group decisions stall because everyone interprets AI's vague output differently
With aidowith.me
- Get AI to show its reasoning at every step so you can verify the logic before acting on it
- Build prompts with explicit criteria and weighting so AI outputs match your real priorities
- Create reusable decision templates for hiring, vendors, features, and budgets
Who Needs These Prompts
Marketers
Content, campaigns, and briefs done in hours instead of days.
Sales & BizDev
Prep calls, draft outreach, research prospects in minutes.
Managers & Leads
Reports, presentations, and team comms handled faster.
How It Works
Define the decision and evaluation criteria
Describe what you're deciding, list 3-5 criteria that matter most, and assign weights. AI uses these to structure its analysis.
Build the reasoning prompt with chain-of-thought
Craft a prompt that tells AI to evaluate each option against each criterion, show its scoring, and explain trade-offs before giving a recommendation.
Test across decision types and save as a template
Run the prompt against 2-3 real decisions. Adjust the criteria structure, then save it as a reusable template with variable slots.
Make Better Decisions With Structured Prompts
Build reasoning prompts that force AI to show its logic, score options, and rank recommendations.
Start This Skill →What You Walk Away With
Define the decision and evaluation criteria
Build the reasoning prompt with chain-of-thought
Test across decision types and save as a template
Create reusable decision templates for hiring, vendors, features, and budgets
"We used the reasoning prompt for our vendor selection. Instead of debating opinions for a week, we had a scored comparison in 20 minutes. Unanimous decision."- Director of Procurement, healthcare company
Questions
It's a prompt structure that tells AI to evaluate a decision by breaking it into criteria, scoring each option, and showing its logic at every step. Instead of getting a vague suggestion, you see how AI arrived at its recommendation. This makes it easier to spot errors and build trust in the output.
Yes. The structured output works well in group settings because everyone sees the same scored analysis. You can adjust criteria weights as a team and rerun the prompt. This removes subjective debate and focuses the conversation on whether the criteria and weights are right.
Any conversational AI works: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini. The prompt structure is tool-agnostic. Longer-context models handle more options and criteria in a single pass. The route tests your prompt in at least two tools so you know it works across platforms.