The Problem and the Fix
Without a skill
- AI output varies wildly between sessions even with the same prompt
- You spend more time reformatting AI responses than you saved by using AI
- Your prompts work sometimes but you don't know why they fail other times
With aidowith.me
- Consistent output format and tone every time, using just 2-3 examples in your prompt
- A clear framework for choosing between zero-shot, one-shot, and few-shot approaches
- Reusable prompt templates with built-in examples for your most common work tasks
Who Builds This With AI
Marketers
Content, campaigns, and briefs done in hours instead of days.
Sales & BizDev
Prep calls, draft outreach, research prospects in minutes.
Managers & Leads
Reports, presentations, and team comms handled faster.
How It Works
Pick a task and write your examples
Choose a task where you need consistent output (emails, summaries, data formatting). Write 2-3 examples of what good output looks like.
Build and test your few-shot prompt
Structure the examples inside a prompt, add your new input, and run it. Compare the output quality to what you got without examples.
Expand to other tasks
Apply the technique to 3-4 more work tasks. Build a library of few-shot prompts you can reuse across projects.
Start using few-shot prompting on your work tasks
15 steps. About 75 minutes. Prompts that deliver consistent output every time.
Start This Skill →What You Walk Away With
Pick a task and write your examples
Build and test your few-shot prompt
Expand to other tasks
Reusable prompt templates with built-in examples for your most common work tasks
"Once I started including examples in my prompts, the reformatting stopped. AI nails my format on the first try now."- Business analyst, financial services firm
Questions
Two to three examples work for most tasks. One example (one-shot) is enough for simple formatting requests. More complex tasks like matching a specific writing style or handling edge cases may benefit from 3-5 examples. The route shows you how to test different counts and find the minimum that produces consistent results for each task.
Yes. The technique is model-agnostic and works the same way across tools. ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini all respond well to examples in the prompt. Some models pick up patterns faster than others, but the core approach is identical. The route tests your prompts across multiple tools so you see where each model performs best.
Zero-shot (no examples) works for straightforward requests where formatting doesn't matter: brainstorming ideas, answering factual questions, or writing a rough first draft. Switch to few-shot when you need specific formatting, consistent tone, or when zero-shot output misses the mark. The route covers both approaches and helps you decide in seconds.